The alternative to outsourced engineering
Argy is an autonomous, governed factory for your software. Your engineers set the rules and objectives; the factory builds, maintains and delivers every change with its evidence bundle.
Your software has been running for years and must be fixed, updated and secured continuously. Today that work is bought from outside, by the day. One unit of work delivered by the factory cost between €34 and €42 depending on the month: a basis for comparing your bill, not a promised unit price.
€34 – €42
Observation basis: real cost of credits consumed divided by units of work delivered; 3 production tenants, 3 months of observation; 238–291 units of work delivered for €10,000 in observed Argy budget · as of
excluding the valuation of avoided risk
indicative, non-contractual
A figure is only worth the ground it was obtained on. That is where everything is decided.
For years now, you have been shown tools that promise to write code faster. None of them touches your services bill, because none starts from what you actually have to keep running, or answers the question your auditor asks. Argy is built on those two constraints.
| What you are offered elsewhere | What Argy delivers |
|---|---|
| A new application generated on an empty repository. | Changes to the code already in production — its authentication, its migrations, its integration pipeline. |
| A per-seat subscription, added on top of the services bill. | A cost per delivered unit, comparable line by line with your unit-of-work catalogue. Argy Code already replaces ad hoc coding assistants; Argy Workbench, coming soon, will extend this steering into a unified cockpit for agentic execution — governed, audited, under your rules. |
| Technical logs to cross-check, coming from six disparate tools. | An evidence bundle per change, audit-ready — because nobody signs off their own approval. |
This promise does not hold for everyone, and we would rather say so early.
We qualify our clients as much as they qualify us. Ask yourself these three questions: if the answer to each is yes, your services bill is exactly the one the factory knows how to absorb.
Conversely, an IT department with strong platform capacity and low regulatory exposure is better off building it in-house. We will tell you in the first meeting rather than at the end of a project.
For those who answer yes three times, the next question is concrete: what do you hand over to the factory on Monday morning?
It is the work your teams keep postponing and your CISO watches closely, with a budget already approved. Findings from code analysis, penetration tests and application scans are fixed, verified and delivered with their evidence — without waiting for a contractor to become available.
Once trust is established on that scope, the factory extends to the rest of your applications' lifecycle:
Handing this work to a machine raises a fair question: how far does it go on its own?
The only vendor that says where its autonomy stops is the only one a CISO can defend before a committee. The level comes down to one question: who sets the objective?
L3
Your engineers set a technical objective; the factory derives the plan and executes it, across every tooled scope.
L4
On broad-mandate DevSecOps scopes, the factory derives remediation objectives itself, within the frame set by your rules.
L5
L5 is not claimed: its authors describe it as a conceptual stage, not a deliverable state.
Each autonomy tier is contracted scope by scope, with the human approval points chosen for your environment. It is reversible, and the factory's configuration belongs to you and can be exported.
That leaves the question every IT department asks in silence: what about your teams?
As in a modern plant, the machines produce while engineers in the control room set the parameters and step in when something goes off track. That role has a name: the Software Factory Engineer (SFE). Your engineers move from writing to validating — they keep the decision and lose the drudgery. We are building the career path with schools and user organizations: skills framework, certification, team trajectory.
See how your engineers become SFEsYour architect and your procurement team will want to check. It is all ready for them.
Security model, deployment options, AI Act mapping and security pack on request: the file goes to your procurement and security teams as is. Aligned with the AI Act, DORA, NIS2 and ISO 42001, hosted in Europe.
You keep your Git, your CI, your models and your tools; the factory brings its own execution agents, governed by your rules. The model gateway, versioned modules and security model are documented for your architects.
Every deployment has its own regulatory constraints and its own contracted autonomy tier. Let's talk about what applies to yours.